Generally speaking, the lens should expose one thing concerning the initial or “target” text that could never be otherwise obvious. Instead, your analysis may phone the credibility regarding the arguments for the lens piece into concern, extend the arguments of this lens text, or provoke various other reevaluation for the two texts. In either case, you’re going to be producing a“dialogue that is critical texts.”
Reading the Texts
You read them is crucial since you will eventually want to hone in on points of commonality and discord between the two texts, the order and manner in which.
First, read the lens text to recognize the author’s core arguments and language. Since theoretical or critical texts are usually thick and complex, it could be useful to develop an outline of this author’s points that are primary. According the to Brandeis Writing Program Handbook, a lens that is valuable will “grapple with main tips” of this lens text, in place of working with remote quotes which could or might not be indicative for the author’s argument all together. As a result, it is crucial to ensure that you certainly comprehend and that can articulate the author’s points that are main continuing to your target text.
Upcoming, quickly see the target text to build up an idea that is general of content. Then, think about: Where do we see basic points of contract or disagreement involving the two texts? Which for the lens text’s primary arguments could be reproduced to your target text? It may possibly be better to concentrate on 1 or 2 of the lens text’s arguments that are central.
With one of these tips at heart, return back and see the target text very carefully, through the lens that is theoretical thinking about the next concerns: which are the primary aspects of the lens text and what exactly are their complementary components into the target text? Continue reading…